CULTURE: 2026-06-01

by | Jun 1, 2026 | Culture | 0 comments

Culture Brief 2026-06-01

Ideas in Circulation

The AI performer question moves from speculation to casting

Whether synthetic actors can meaningfully inhabit roles — and what that does to film as an art form — is no longer hypothetical.

Taffy Brodesser-Akner’s magazine piece deploys the celebrity profile form against itself — using a format built on interiority and presence to encounter a subject who has neither — and arrives somewhere genuinely unsettling. Edwards, at an industry event, put the commercial case plainly: it’ll replace CGI, it does whatever you ask. The pairing matters because one piece asks what is lost and the other asks what is gained, and neither fully answers. The industry is already past the deliberation stage. The cultural criticism has not caught up.

Internet-native horror is remaking the box office, and critics and audiences are disagreeing about it

A YouTube creator turned A24 filmmaker grossed $82 million on a $10 million production; the critical consensus was that the concept wore thin at feature length.

The Backrooms phenomenon — an internet creepypasta built on a single liminal image — is worth watching not as a box office curiosity but as a structural signal. A generation raised on found-footage YouTube and algorithmic dread has developed horror aesthetics that critics trained on cinema find underdeveloped. The disconnect between critical reception and audience appetite here is the story, not the movie itself. A24 is making a bet that the pipeline from online creator to theatrical director is now a repeatable model.

Russian cultural destruction in Ukraine as historical record and ongoing event

The targeting of museums and cultural infrastructure is being covered as both immediate news and long-duration civilizational loss.

The Guardian’s on-the-ground piece from the damaged Chornobyl Museum is the kind of reported essay that forces the abstract question — what is destroyed when cultural institutions are destroyed — into the specific. The timing of the attack, hitting a museum mid-renovation with new interpretive displays about the 1986 nuclear disaster, gives the loss an additional layer: not just the physical space but an act of reinterpretation, a community’s effort to reclaim its own history, interrupted. This will be a recurring thread in how the war’s cultural consequences are narrated in the years ahead.

The Enlightenment under simultaneous attack from multiple directions

Aeon publishes a substantive argument that the left and right critiques of Enlightenment rationalism have ended up doing the same damage from opposite sides.

Eliane Glaser’s essay refuses the standard defenses. She doesn’t argue the Enlightenment was good, therefore worth protecting; she argues that the Enlightenment’s central bequest — permanent, self-undermining critique — is exactly what both its progressive critics (who condemn it as the ideology of empire) and its conservative champions (who invoke it as civilizational property) have abandoned. The essay is an intellectual provocation that has immediate political application: it names how the discourse around reason has become a performance of tribal affiliation rather than its exercise.

Scoring systems, games, and the capture of value: David Runciman on how metrics become traps

The LRB’s Runciman essay engages a question metastasizing across every domain from academia to social media to finance.

Runciman’s argument is dialectical rather than polemical: scoring systems liberate and oppress through the same mechanism — the rules. He’s writing ostensibly about games, but the analogy to institutional metrics (university rankings, engagement metrics, ESG scores) is explicit. The piece is especially useful in its insistence that the answer to captured scoring is not abolition but better scoring — a position that resists both naive technocracy and fashionable anti-quantification. Worth reading alongside Stefan Collini’s essay in the same LRB issue on British universities, which shows in granular detail what value capture by metrics actually looks like in practice.

—

Books, Film, Music, Art Worth Attention

Fjord — Cristian Mungiu’s Palme d’Or winner, a multilingual drama staging the confrontation between religious conservatism and social liberalism; Romania’s director of 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days working in the mode that earned him that film’s prize.

The Last Viking — Mads Mikkelsen plays a man who believes he is John Lennon in a Danish dark-comedy crime film from Anders Thomas Jensen; a more interesting entry point into Danish genre cinema than its premise suggests.

The Currents — Argentine director Milagros Mumenthaler’s film about a fashion stylist in free fall, described in terms that suggest the kind of formally careful, psychologically dense work that rarely gets theatrical distribution in English-language markets.

Forastera — A first feature from Mallorca in which a teenager begins inhabiting aspects of her dead grandmother; elliptical and ghost-story-adjacent without being genre, which puts it in interesting territory.

Hal Foster: At MoMA — Foster reviews the new Duchamp retrospective, arguing that a large dose of the actual work is the best cure for the exhaustion of endless readymade derivatives; worth reading before or after seeing the show.

Paul McCartney: The Boys of Dungeon Lane — An 18th solo album at 83, reviewed in the Guardian as a record on which “his gift for melody still astounds”; interesting less as a McCartney document than as a question about what late-period work by major artists can do that mid-career work cannot.

Killing Spree — Jorie Graham — Graham’s new collection positioned as elegies for a lost utopian imagination; the review suggests she’s writing with the compressed urgency of someone who has stopped hedging her apocalyptic themes.

—

Essays Worth the Read

Artist of sympathy and cruelty

Dorian Bandy’s essay argues that Mozart’s particular genius was constructing operatic situations of such moral complexity that audiences cannot maintain comfortable detachment — the music forces identification with characters doing indefensible things. This is not a biographical or musicological piece; it is a philosophical argument about what opera as a form can do that other art forms cannot, and it uses Mozart as its strongest case.

Gen Z but two centuries ago

Emily Herring draws a substantive parallel between post-Napoleonic French youth — the generation of Musset and Vigny, who called their condition the mal du siècle — and the present discourse around Gen Z ennui and “empty world” disaffection. The essay is not a superficial analogy; it traces the structural conditions (economic stagnation after a period of historic upheaval, collapse of available political ideals) that produced both moments and asks what the 19th-century case suggests about how the current one might resolve.

Love in a Fallen City: Shanghai’s Marriage Market

Becky Zhang’s Paris Review dispatch from Shanghai’s People’s Park, where parents gather on weekends to advertise their unmarried adult children, is an exceptionally observed piece of social reporting. It works as portraiture, as social history, and as an oblique account of the distance between China’s demographic anxieties at the policy level and the very human negotiations happening on a square of grass on a Sunday afternoon.

—

One Thing Worth Reading Deeply

Stefan Collini: Squadrons of Pigs

Collini’s LRB essay on British universities goes deeper than the familiar complaints about funding and marketization to examine how the premises of the student loan system — that education is a private investment with a calculable return — have transformed the internal culture of institutions, the behavior of administrators, and the experience of intellectual life itself. He is not making a nostalgic argument for a golden age; he is doing something harder, which is showing how a particular set of economic assumptions, once embedded in institutional structure, changes what people think they are doing when they teach or study. The argument extends well beyond Britain, and it is the kind of structural analysis that makes other coverage of education policy feel like it is describing symptoms without touching the disease.